Quote from: davout on March 09, 2015, 01:03:21 PM

Quote from: DooMAD on March 09, 2015, 11:43:38 AM

Linking to an article that mentions "mass market adoption" while supporting a limit that would suppress mass adoption only further serves to highlight the dichotomy in your stance. You can't have it both ways. If you want mass adoption, 1MB is not sufficient. But most of the other things you've said in the various threads on this topic seem to suggest you don't want mass adoption.

If I really have to spell it out for you... I *own* Paymium. In other words : I am qualified to state what is strategic, and in the interest of startups of the space. You are not.

I figured based on the sig. That's not the part you need to spell out in plain English. If you are actively helping merchants to accept Bitcoin for any purchase, no matter how small, in a move towards mass adoption, why are you also stating that you'd prefer those smaller transactions on another chain and supporting a limit that would force that outcome? Why are you doing one thing and saying the opposite?