Quote from: Silverspoon on March 10, 2015, 02:24:35 AM

Quote from: MidwestMiner on March 10, 2015, 02:15:43 AM

Quote from: Silverspoon on March 10, 2015, 02:01:34 AM

Quote from: MidwestMiner on March 10, 2015, 01:55:50 AM

...
I disagree. Havelock has cristal clear rules and they take no responsibility for anything but listing, trades and dividend distribution. In the mintspare case, what do you suggest they do? Just give shareholders escrowed funds? That's not how it works.

Havelock also makes it crystal clear in its TOS that it doe not deal with US citizens. Both of the offerings which have not tanked (Matt's and Benny's) have been issued by US nationals from US soil. So yeah...

Re. "fail rates well within range for 1st year startups": Well no, they're not, but even if startups had such abysmal rates, how many IRL start-ups simply OKTHXBAI from their creditors?

What do you mean "not tanked"? There are several listings that are alive and well (Crypto financial, Casino Bitcoin etc) ...

CryptoFinancial (ticker:CFI)

Price @IPO: .15
Price now: .04
Dividends paid: ZERO.

Casino Bitcoin (ticker:CBTC)

price @IPO .00012 to .00018
price now: .00005025

Now I'm not talking about an occasional scam on a field of virgin win, I'm talking about wall-to-wall scam, as in NeoBee and Basic Mining level shit.
And the thing is, I'm just saddened by the childlike artlessness of it all (The Panama Fund, Imagine? Cheesy

), not the fact that he took your lunch money.

CBTC Bitcoin price at IPO $90 current $300. I'm USD its unchanged and the operation is growing same goes for Cryptofinancial. Not sure how that's anywhere near fail or scam.