Quote from: truckinusa on March 10, 2015, 05:44:15 PM

Quote from: CoinFire on March 10, 2015, 04:41:46 PM

Quote from: truckinusa on March 10, 2015, 03:47:05 AM

Quote from: CoinFire on March 10, 2015, 02:57:32 AM

Quote from: HashieNewb on March 10, 2015, 02:29:21 AM

Quote from: CoinFire on March 10, 2015, 12:29:18 AM

Quote from: KC6TTR on March 09, 2015, 11:07:58 PM

Quote from: CoinFire on March 09, 2015, 09:36:13 PM

For an SEC investigation that doesn't exist the attorneys for Josh sure turned over a lot of stuff to the government as part of the subpoena process.

We are now in possession of those documents and have begun sorting through them.

Clarification needed: How are you a party to the chain of custody regarding the paperwork between the private law firm and the agencies involved?

Scott-

I can not under any circumstances reveal my sources.

I asked you previously why you continue to bait this thread with your connections to the SEC with nothing substantial to report. Scott didn't ask you to reveal your sources, he asked "How are you a party to the chain of custody regarding the paperwork between the private law firm and the agencies involved?"

To even state how we obtained it would jeopardize our sources.

How is it baiting this thread when each time we've made such a statement we have published a story regarding the documents?

Edit: We won't be publishing on this message board any further. Our reporting will simply stand for itself.

I enjoy your posts. Have a thicker skin. I joined your coinfire plus btw. I appreciate what you do. Looking forward to checking out your new service.

We won't be publishing messages regarding what is upcoming anymore Wink

No offense taken by anything said here. Just a matter of making sure we aren't revealing anything that will cause issues for our sources and some valid points have been raised that each time we say we received XYZ someone enterprising at an agency might realize who received those documents recently and put two and two together Wink

I was just curious if you could elaborate. My question is about the Coinbrief article that included the leaked emails detailing the SEC investigation. You stated in one of your previous articles that they were under SEC investigation, but didn't include much detail. Were the leaked emails just icing on the cake or were they the identical information(maybe from a different source?)? I just found it odd that the leaked emails appeared shortly after you had stated that the SEC was investigating GAW. We still don't really know what the SEC is attempting to do. It would be nice to know what direction they are taking this.

We will start evaluating the CoinBrief emails to see if they match the stuff we have and I'll try to make sure our next report looks at that specific detail in the future.

I want to make sure what we tell you regarding those specific details is accurate.

As far as which direction they are going this is most certainly a multi-prong investigation if you will. Unregistered securities is a major issue and one they have certainly been pressing. As we sort through more materials we hope to have more details.