Quote from: SpiryGolden on March 10, 2015, 10:22:14 PM

Quote from: djm34 on March 10, 2015, 10:18:57 PM

Quote from: zmija on March 10, 2015, 09:57:10 PM

Quote from: SpiryGolden on March 10, 2015, 09:42:07 PM

Quote from: biskit on March 10, 2015, 09:24:38 PM

Quote from: SpiryGolden on March 10, 2015, 09:01:34 PM

Well I suspect that somebody has a GPU miner active . one user has 40 MH/s on suprnova . Which to be honest 16 core = 650 kh/sec so lets see it needs around 80 cpu's with 16 cores. Makes sense ? Neah ... I am 80% sure that it's using GPU...

Ok fine with Xeon Phi would make it around 1.2 MH'ses so still it needs 40 of them .

I am using 2xXeon E5-2670 = 16 cores and gets me 650 kh/sec. So I guess Xeon Phi after some quick google research could do double .

I got it somebody working @ CERN | Accelerating science is throwing all the hashrate Cheesy

. The fact is with a C++ and CUDA or OpenCL coding knowledge could easily overwite the code from let's say spreadcoin ccminer witch is based on X11 and cpuminer similar to this coin. But those two miners were obviously so excited that they brag about rewriting the miner and now they call themselfs a "liars". Lesson learned, next time if u have an advantage be quitet, don't brag about it and enjoy it while it lasts Wink

sarcasms are really wasted on you Shocked

ps: go ahead overwrite spreadcoin Grin

(and no, this algo isn't similar to x11 or then all algos are similar to x11)

Fine then explain 40Mh/s from a single user . Xeon Phi idea won't work .

yup wasted Grin

anyway... there are cpu farms, vps, aws instance, rentals and so on...
not everybody is running only with their cpu's laptop, so even though their could be a few gpu's, the large part of the hashrate is still from cpu's. Few days ago there was a cpu guys (so he said) running 100MH/s and ddosing suprnova at the same time.

No matter where you go (gpu, cpu, xeon phi if anyone developped the code for, fpga, asic) there are always a larger fish.