Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 02, 2012, 01:32:18 PM

Quote from: Inedible on August 02, 2012, 01:21:25 PM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 02, 2012, 01:13:49 PM

Quote from: Inedible on August 02, 2012, 01:12:01 PM

It's unlikely the exchanges are going to make this public any time soon.

It's funny how that works. They don't mind libeling and breaking their privacy agreement with a user to make claims that he's a crook publicly, but they don't want to post proof and run off of the forums with their tails between their legs once legal action is threatened. Priceless.

I've been looking through the thread but I don't see anything conclusive that says they pointed the finger. I've probably missed it as there are 50 pages.

Did they do the finger pointing first? I.e. they made it public first AND also disclosed private information.

Can I also clarify that this isn't AurumXchange we're talking about here but Bitcoinica?

It's the first post of the other thread. This theead is just Zhou's response to the madness as that thread turned into a witch hunt almost instantly.

aye, I stopped following about 20 pages back ;p