Quote from: MaNI on March 12, 2015, 06:50:18 AM

With all due respect while much of your post is based on facts I personally have several problems with your post.

1) Why do you aim to tear things down instead of build, pnd is only dead if people like you intent on tearing it down make it so, there is no reason pnd could not go on to thrive from here - perhaps you should make yourself aware of all the *positive* talk going on at http://www.pandacointalk.com and become part of the solution instead of the problem.
2) You complain about others hiding their identity yet you make a special account to post under not even using your normal 'pseudo identity' - why not lead the way and at least have the guts to post under your normal nickname?
3) You paraphrase in a lot of places and put words that are not there - my post certainly doesn't show amDOGE to be 'untrustworthy' - unresponsive and disinterested, yes you could definitely say so but nowhere do I feel or insinuate that amDOGE is untrustworthy - I have no doubt that amDOGE can be trusted. I also definitely do not feel amDOGE to be arrogant, either as above only unresponsive and disinterested.
There could be many reasons for this other than arrogance, depression for instance.

I'm merely speaking behalf of those that are too scared of 'FUDDING' that might impact short term price. But really, everyone is thinking the same thoughts.

But thanks for validating my research as facts, as I was not sure whether my insider was telling 100% truth. But it seems like the current dev member list needs a massive overhaul, and that we've been lied to for months about who was actually working on the coin.

The space needs transparency, and we're getting none.