Quote from: xandry on March 16, 2015, 10:04:49 AM

Quote from: Mr.Anonymous on March 16, 2015, 08:20:01 AM

I see that You goal is to take mod rights, but You are not public people in our society (guessing for Your weak position).

I do not pursue such a goal, so again I ask: why do you think so? You've never answered a similar question.

I know good how special forces (agents) work in Internet. Same scenario to obtain mod rights. Do You hear about moderation stories in public forums and trackers and FSB-agents?

Quote from: xandry on March 16, 2015, 10:04:49 AM

Quote from: Mr.Anonymous on March 16, 2015, 08:20:01 AM

In last weeks we again talk about moderation of Russian section but where are You ?

You're kidding right? Please read this thread and and think twice, who of us was not active.

Here is voting: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990069.0 We initiate a new voting because some of current candidates is inadequate.
Here is discussion too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=989882.0

And take a loot at voting: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=794025.160 Results: 32 thinks that Russian section is fine and no need in moderator vs 30. 52.4 % vs 47.6 %

Quote from: xandry on March 16, 2015, 10:04:49 AM

Quote from: Mr.Anonymous on March 16, 2015, 08:20:01 AM

And You are not interesting to support my offering to handle spam without picking full rights moderator.

And again... Why do you think so? I said it was not interesting to me? I have to respond to your every utterance? If I did not say anything, then it means nothing. You build some imagination, and then I find myself in this blame.

Decentralization is better than centralization and yep, I don't see that You support my idea that bring that decentralization solution to cleanup spam. Yep, my guesswork based on my analysis and logic. But I have no other information to make complete analyzing.

And I see in threads that candidates must be "Hero Member" rank at least .

So, we initiate a new round. Now we are collecting candidates.