Quote from: megges on March 16, 2015, 06:48:17 PM

Quote from: oblox on March 16, 2015, 06:36:40 PM

Quote from: arielbit on March 16, 2015, 06:33:01 PM

Quote from: BlockaFett on March 16, 2015, 06:22:58 PM

Quote from: arielbit on March 16, 2015, 06:08:06 PM

using these products analogy is simply retarded.. crypto currency is closer to stocks than products like big mac, banana etc.

nope, crypto currency is legally property as is a big mac. Neither convey any legal rights other than under property law. Shares on the other hand convey rights under company law including a share of ownership of the actual brand. (look at it like shares are property with additional rights under company law, crypto currencies don't have those as they are just property)

i am not a lawyer..but why do i feel that darkcoin is destroying my property and creating confusion by buying and selling their property under my property's name?

Good thing Darkcoin isn't selling their property under your property's name. DASH =/= Dashcoin. Further, you're free to continue development at your own leisure.

Thats the point, i pointed out a few times, that all these discussions MyFarm and the other trolls are having are pure speculation.

There was no information published what that darkcoin / dashcoin deal was. The only thing we know for sure is that the github of dashcoin changed. - Does this fact makes any change to your dashcoin? NO. (You can trade, own dashcoin nothing changed at all.)

Noone is destroying anything besides the trolls themselfs.

Darkcoin is not even taking the dashcoin name, its named DASH.
(But i guess reading a word with more then 4 characters is to hard for you trolls)

One of the most concerning things is the Darkcoin community isn't screaming bloody murder about how the Dashcoin deal went down. You're all forever talking about how you'd have to buy such an enormous amount of masternodes to compromise the network. Yet what Evan has done is set precedent saying it is ok to take over a coin by buying out the dev and taking over the repo. This creates a MASSIVE centralization issue for Darkcoin. What you are all saying is it is ok for a company or government entity to approach Evan (or his eventual successor) with big $$$, buy him out, take over github, and then they have all legal rights to the coin. They don't have to spend a penny on the open market buying up coins, they don't have to find a vulnerability in the code, they don't have to buy 4000 masternodes. They just have to find the main developer's price.

And make no mistake, EVERYONE has a price.

Scary.