Quote from: BADecker on March 17, 2015, 05:35:17 AM

Quote from: the joint on March 17, 2015, 05:28:56 AM

Quote from: BADecker on March 17, 2015, 05:23:45 AM

Quote from: XinXan on March 17, 2015, 05:15:53 AM

Quote from: BADecker on March 17, 2015, 04:08:52 AM

Quote from: (oYo) on March 16, 2015, 06:11:09 PM

Quote from: Decksperiment on March 16, 2015, 05:48:16 PM

By extended vocabulary, do you mean misspelling every second word (even with spell check) and making up others altogether? I feel sorry for your kids, that is if you really have any. Did your parents have any kids that lived?

As far as my counter attacks on you goes, I've done so when you attack other people too, not just Vod. Is it my fault somehow that you have a hard on for him?

-------------------------------------------

DUH! I'M GOD!

<--- Dickexperiment

You and I certainly don't agree on everything... maybe on few things. But you said this soooo well^^.

You dont have the right to talk here until you disprove the sequoia

Thanks for permission to post here - do I need it? - since the proof for God found in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 obliterates any sequoia ideas, whatever they might be.

Yeah, that's not proof. How many times do we need to tell you this?

That's called "really bad suggestive reasoning" with conclusions that in no way follow from the premises.

There cannot be conclusive, empirical evidence for something that is, by definition, non-empirical.

It's impossible. The end. Talk less, listen more.

In the first place, the stuff written at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 isn't really the evidence. It only points at the evidence. When what is expressed at the link is examined in detail, then the evidence is brought out into the open in abundance just like the link states.

God is within the universe as well as without. Therefore universe-style evidence can be used, and extra-universe evidence can be alluded to.

Your end simply ends yourself, or ultimately will, if you don't change.

EDIT: Wow! Page 218 !

1) So, it "isn't really the evidence." Well, I'm glad you finally agree it isn't proof. It's evidence of evidence? So, it's basically worthless on its own as far as reasoning about God. Yep, that's about right.

2) So, you're saying stuff in the Universe is evidence of stuff outside of the Universe. Are you drunk?

3) My end simply...what? What the hell?

When you make up your own word meanings and (invalid) forms of reasoning, you just make meaningless statements. None of what you say is relevant to anything and anyone.