Quote from: BADecker on March 17, 2015, 11:15:48 AM

Quote from: XinXan on March 17, 2015, 08:19:38 AM

Quote from: BADecker on March 17, 2015, 08:03:23 AM

Quote from: XinXan on March 17, 2015, 07:57:03 AM

Quote from: BADecker on March 17, 2015, 07:55:39 AM

Quote from: XinXan on March 17, 2015, 07:43:17 AM

Quote from: BADecker on March 17, 2015, 07:37:11 AM

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on March 17, 2015, 07:24:24 AM

Quote from: BADecker on March 02, 2015, 08:31:23 PM

Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation?

By what criteria is the Bible more accurate than Phoenix Journals?

I find Journals are more logical and explicit in meaning; every attempt is made to get at the Truth.

Quote from: http://www.phoenixsourcedistributors.com/PJ_37.pdf

"I would not send lesser unto my children"--I am Aton. If you know not who IS Aton, I hope that you will do enough homework to find the answer.

As with typical mankind, you ones wish to begin at the end of the story and have others assume responsibility for YOUR education. No, that will not serve in this instance--we have purposely brought you over 40 books of insight, Truth and instructions beginning with your plight, your direction, your solutions and your divine reclamation through, and by, God. We have brought you full and detailed explanations of the working details of the Cosmos, Universe and what God is and how the cycles of perceived life and death "work". We have put it in a format which you, as man in trouble, can easily understand--the rest is up to you.

Does this mean that the JOURNALS are through? No indeed, we shall continue until the play is finished; however, it means that the eight most important books of your planet are now before you--as you use this one. I am sorry to disappoint ones who either feel "another" can explain it TO YOU and/or YOU who feel so wise as to explain and foist off your opinion of the material upon another in explanation. It is a time of self-opinion and discernment and understanding, for the transition will not be made except by those who have come within the KNOWING! This does not mean that you have to understand every working detail--but you MUST comprehend within that which is the overall.

If Journals have a more logical and explicit explanation of the Bible, then this makes them more accurate.

It was fun, all this off-topic talk about all kinds of things in this thread. But since the Title of the thread has been substantially covered by OP's initial post, and by the info here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, what really is there more to discuss except for more points regarding proof for or against God's existence?

Maybe you didnt read the title because it clearly says SCIENTIFIC proof not what you wrote there.

Well, the only way scientists turn evidence into proof is through scientific measurement and examination. So the info at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is scientific proof when they use scientific measurement and examination to prove it up. Of course, people don't absolutely need scientific measurement and examination to recognize proof when they see it, so the fact that it is scientific as well is a bonus that strengthens the proof.

Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks.

If you are a scientist, then you don't need my explanations. If you are not a scientist, explaining wouldn't do any good. You wouldn't understand. However, I would gladly train you in science for the right fee. But my fee would be so high that you would be better off going to school.

You don't need to have scientific training to see how https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 proves the existence of God.

So in other words you dont know, if scientists really knew and they didnt need your explanations they would have already measured and examined right? Show us the scientific proof then?

It's beginning to look like you wouldn't know what the proof was if it walked right up and bit you in the left eyeball. All you need do is go here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 and read it.

'If you are a scientist, then you don't need my explanations. If you are not a scientist, explaining wouldn't do any good. You wouldn't understand'

Why dont you try to make us understand, as i previously said this thread says 'SCIENTIFIC' explanation, what you wrote there is not scientific just philosophical