Quote from: Bitcoin Yoga on March 17, 2015, 10:28:30 PM

Quote from: CryForMeSky on March 17, 2015, 10:24:59 PM

Quote from: Bitcoin Yoga on March 17, 2015, 10:03:01 PM

Quote from: CryForMeSky on March 17, 2015, 09:44:31 PM

Quote from: Bitcoin Yoga on March 17, 2015, 08:02:52 PM

Quote from: ndnhc on March 17, 2015, 07:55:57 PM

Escrow or no one plays. Simple as that.

I think you still owe me for topping the one before the one before this one.

We didn't reach the minimum amount of bought levels to be able to payout. This time, we lowered the prizes and upped the fee for answers. I hope that even things out so it can run smoothly.

There is nothing in the rules on your site or in your OP that say anything about a "minimum amount of bought levels". There is just a payout structure. Are there hidden rules? Seems shady.

Also the price per hint on your linked site says ".005BTC" while your OP says ".01BTC". Seems amateurish.

Edit: Looking at your history it seems like this is the third time you've tried to run this. Looks like the past two times you've not payed out the amounts promised.

We've returned all bought answers. Over 0.15 was returned to players. If we missed you, your Bitcoin can be credited towards answers for this new game.

That doesn't answer my question. Are there hidden rules to the game? Why are those rules hidden and not out in the open? Have you run this game twice in the past? Have you payed out the promised amounts in the previous two games?

Are you trying to be high quality or what? There are no hidden rules, and no, we didn't payout in the previous games for reasons stated above.

I don't know what "be high quality" means. Am I expecting high quality out of someone who is looking for my business? Yes.

If there are no hidden rules, then you should have payed out the past games. Right? If the rules stated "here are the payouts" and said nothing about "minimum amount of bought levels" then you are obligated to pay out as listed, even if it means you run at a deficit for the game. That's called fairness and transparency.