Quote from: BigTimeProducer on March 19, 2015, 02:31:25 AM

Quote from: Sapereaude on March 19, 2015, 02:26:00 AM

Quote from: Joshuar on March 19, 2015, 02:15:43 AM

Quote from: Sapereaude on March 19, 2015, 01:55:56 AM

Quote from: Joshuar on March 19, 2015, 01:38:31 AM

Quote from: Sapereaude on March 19, 2015, 01:14:02 AM

Quote from: anonymousxx1503 on March 18, 2015, 11:48:27 PM

Hey quick notice! @darkcoinnews rebranding (Not to Dash)

I will not be covering news about Darkcoin anymore and have thus changed my @darkcoinnews twitter account name/logo/etc. I'll still be checking in here regularly since I'm hooked anyways but I won't help promote Darkcoin actively anymore.

While I was optimistic at first for a rebranding, the way the situation was handled was absolutely horrible. Dash itself is IMO quite a bad choice for the name and I've been vocal about that but the fact that no alternatives were seriously discussed and that the decision was made permanent within a few days was a dictator move instead of a decentralized currency and it made me rethink the effort I put into promoting.

I definitely could have lived with Dash if we came up with a few great alternatives and then put it to a real vote. Instead it went from rumors, to first announcement, to confirmation within a few days. (Don't come at me with "A decision HAD to be taken" bullshit, there was no hurry and a few more weeks wouldn't have changed anything).

I'm keeping all my Darkcoin and I remain always impressed by the development speed and the resulting tech. I'll definitely give some Twitter shout outs to interesting developments but it won't be my main focus anymore. So this notice is really for those of you who want to unfollow me.

Apple, Google, Microsoft all decided on the names of products without me, how dare they!

#tears

Apple, Google, Microsoft, are exactly why Satoshi made Bitcoin, to get away from centralized control on important decisions.

You talk to Satoshi often? : p but seriously I am not sure you can say naming dash is equally important as developing the underlying technology. Even if it was I have yet to hear a compelling argument as to why weeks of uncertainty and community friction is preferable to simply ripping the band aid off and going with dash.

Even simple questions like putting together a shortlist or method of voting would have divided and distracted the community. So it seems to have been the right decision, especially since to date I haven't seen and contenders to the name Dash anyway.

I've seen a plethora of alternative names to Dash that have been suggested by the community. What I haven't seen is a vote, a poll, or anything for the darkcoin community to get a say in the name change, neither here or on darkcointalk.

I never said there weren't any alternative names, just that none of the names garnered any real support. Also you haven't provided a compelling argument as to why "why weeks of uncertainty and community friction is preferable to simply ripping the band aid off and going with dash".

Edit: Also you have not explained why naming is as important as the underlying technology. I'm pretty sure people would use cars even if they were named wheelboxes.

You just need to go through his history to see his intentions

I used to be a fervent supporter of Darkcoin, so yes check the history. Also, I'm not getting what you're saying by "why weeks of uncertainty and community friction is preferable to simply ripping the band aid off and going with dash", as far as I've known and seen, hardly anyone has been complaining about the name Darkcoin. A few users saying "The name Darkcoin is bad", doesn't mean that there has been weeks of uncertainty and community friction, lol.