Quote from: smbbm on March 19, 2015, 06:04:58 PM

Quote from: Eurbids on March 19, 2015, 05:48:36 PM

Quote from: smbbm on March 19, 2015, 05:08:23 PM

Quote from: Viorcoin on March 19, 2015, 04:50:56 PM

I think the best way forward is to merge viorcoin into Korecoin. I already reached out to Eurbids

What would that mean for the project, development and features, strategy and overall direction?
And what would that mean for current Viorcoin share holders?

some info here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=668886.msg9623014#msg9623014

Thanks Eurbids, there are some of my comments/questions to that:
* POW is to for me very obsolete concept that can work only for Bitcoin (from historical and business reasons).
* If major code will be built on qt it's very archaic architecture in my eyes and poor choice for the future (but I can survive that if there are very experienced developers in it who can build things fast with that).
* I'm not happy about your plans using Tor. Tor is compromised technology, tor is slow, tor has very bad name for mainstream and it's joined with all worst possible kind of things. In addition of all of that network is old and I think it's dying.
and one more:
* I would like to know what amount of share would 1% of Viorcoins mean in Kore based on your expectations?

Sorry I had to use the word "obsolete" in so many forms ;-)

voip cannot walk throught the TOR network, because TOR don't support UDP protocol. We use TOR only for the p2p network, it's fully encrypted and guarantees your privacy throught the network (read it like your ISP). in addition permit to users that live in a internet controlled areas to use the wallet.

about POW it's very important for refresh users in the community and take more attentions. Miners always search a good coin to mine. If you look the most important coins, all have POW active yet. POS much more bad, very dangerous for security. maybe I will add a POS option into an external platform only (like a web bank).