How is it a critique? Well a terrible one at best. He just says "Darkcoin is bad mkaaay?". How is that any kind of argument. Also it looks like boilerplate because I read that empty "sub par anonymity"-phrase earlier somewhere else.
No technical explanation whatsoever.
Whatever happened to the pathetic "We can de-anonymize DarkSend tx"-crowd anyway? None of those losers delivered more than smack talk just like the guy in the screenshot.
Ok, thanks! So my understanding is this: from a purely perfectionist theoretical technical point of view, Darksend might be "subpar", but it has no actual practical relevance because it is safe enough for real world usage? Correct?
Nit picking over whether something is 99.99998% or 99.99999991% anonymous is missing the point, and anyway nothing can take the place of the global infrastructure of 2383 Masternodes facilitating instantX and now also blinding will subterfuge the coins to another anonymous level.
P.S. glad you like the Adam Curtis , btw
