Quote from: iCEBREAKER on March 22, 2015, 06:36:27 AM

Quote from: masternode on March 22, 2015, 05:14:10 AM

You seem to be trying to redirect the conversation away from some simple facts around VIA that I point out, mostly that Drak refuses to support the advancement of VIA with the ICO funds intended for that purpose, and his offer that 1M VIA could be used as community funds is laughable. What do you have to say about those two specific points? Or are you going to try and digress again and somehow use another coin that I support as a case for ignoring what Drak is doing with the ICO funds?

I've asked nothing unreasonable AT ALL. If he is truly honorable, then it should be easy to just get a trusted member to handle finances, show where money has been spent, and agree to spend the money intended for advancing the coin for that purpose moving forward.

"Outright lie?"

Are you saying that CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY is an outright lie? I must admit not being sufficiently Toddcore to experiment with this new option myself. But it sounds cool and hella cyber, like something Transformers would do or say or fight about, so I want (at an emotional level) it to be true.

Is nLockTime an outright lie also? I'll feel silly if it is, for reasons already explained. But enough of this unprecedented direction towards simple facts around VIA.

If DashcoinDark's instmined had been acquired honestly in the scrupulous manner of VIA's ICO, I might have put a few coins into it.

But it wasn't, and yet, you still heap praise and lavish support on that other project.

This speaks to your credibility, which I must evaluate when you insist I critically re-evaluate Drak's with an eye towards finding fault and dishonor.

IceBreaker, do you read the posts before you respond? Masternode wasn't saying that CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY is a lie. I won't bother explaining what he did say - you should take the time to read it yourself.

Are you not curious about the 600BTC funds? Do you think Drak spent 600BTC implementing CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY?

Why not join us in asking for clarification from Drak on the use of those funds. If you hold VIA, you should be as concerned as we are about this issue.

Why not support our request for transparency on VIA instead of deflecting the question and ripping on Darkcoin?