It's far more reasonable and interesting seeing your arguments than that of BADecker's array of incorrect, inaccurate, and mostly plain false "information".
I am trying to go beyond what the joint and Herbert Spencer are saying:
If I succeed in proving the afterlife while failing to prove God, it is fine with me; at least the truth is known!
I am happy to agree with you that God exists within. I think that is where the "proof" of God will come from: within you!
debating whether God exists in an empirical context is a flawed approach.
It is a flawed approach because God has no limitations.
God's WORD is very real and
I suspect
that is a better topic for
debate/discussion.
IS HATONN REAL?
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE IF THAT WHICH I OFFER IS VALID TRUTH?
Sir, where is the reply to the scientific evidence I have posted in this thread?
SO I ASK THIS THREAD: WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE TO TALK ABOUT GOD WHEN THERE IS PROOF OF THE AFTERLIFE RIGHT HERE
AND NOBODY WANTS TO TALK ABOUT IT?!