Hi Joshuar, I believe I have already responded to your fallacious "arguments".
The concept of the afterlife also applies the notions that souls exist, which they do not.
This fallacy is often stated in this way but what it really means is that belief in the afterlife is not supported by evidence.[T]his notion of
extraordinary claims and proof cannot be considered part of the scientific method. It is only possible to consider it a statement of how bias interferes with objectivity. When skeptics assert this notion, if they are not cynically trying to
misdirect the discussion away from evidence they don't want to consider, and if they are being sincere, then
they are actually demonstrating that they are refusing to consider the evidence objectively.
giving adequate reasons for rejecting the evidence said to prove something exists is equivalent to proving the thing doesn't exist. Therefore, a skeptic can disprove the existence of spirits and the afterlife by giving adequate reasons for rejecting the evidence said to demonstrate their existence.https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/skeptical_fallacies#skeptical_fallacies_extraordinary_claimsJust how do you intend to prove your statement that souls exist not, Joshuar?
How do you intend to prove they do exist? I've given the reason for why we have the concept of souls, to try and explain who we are essentially(emotions, personality, thoughts), all of which we now know today as coming from the brain. Belief in the soul stemmed from the fact that they could not previously explain those things(emotions, personality, thoughts etc) and they used the concept of soul to incorrectly do so.
At least do your research as to where these faulty words come from, and besides that it's impossible to fully prove or disprove a entirely theoretical concept such as the soul. With that in mind, it is however logically possible to put the soul into the same category as, " The earth is flat, Earth is center of the universe, Santa Claus exists, The toothfairy exists, Goku just fought Omega Shenron in Central Park) aka fiction.
The flawed concept of the soul is not synonymous with the concept of Consciousness, if that's what you have twisted up btw.