Quote from: majamina on March 25, 2015, 06:32:35 PM

Quote from: Macno on March 25, 2015, 06:27:32 PM

Quote from: majamina on March 25, 2015, 06:21:55 PM

Quote from: fluffypony on March 25, 2015, 06:14:49 PM

Quote from: Macno on March 25, 2015, 06:02:23 PM

So to put that in laymens terms: darksend is fine for usage in darkmarkets after all and fluffpony agrees?

Thus far I believe the rest of my assertions to be correct.

Well, I'm still not convinced by your assessment of MN network vulnerability. You seem to be in realms of the theoretical rather than the practical....

Ok, so you could somehow compromise the MN network, but you can`t be de-anonymized because you did not do enough "opsec" other than mixing your coins.

No, I'm not sure you can compromise the MN network in any practical sense, assuming it works as designed.

Sorry, I meant that fluffpony thinks so (and you are not sure about it). Sorry if I keep trying to break things down to a very simple outcome. I just want to understand the practical implications of those discussions. Practical like for users who don`t care about the tech details (like myself...), but who would be extremely pissed (and endangered) if they discovered that they face jailtime because of some problems with the change of their supposedly anonymized Dash. So, yes, Darksend is safe enough and the MN problem is still up for debate (but a potential problem is about as likely as a 51% attack on BTC by the NSA). Correct?