Quote from: toknormal on March 29, 2015, 09:36:12 PM

Quote from: Joshuar on March 29, 2015, 09:07:41 PM

By stuck you know that it means it's not on the market available to trade. No matter how easy it can become "un-stuck" is irrelevant.

Well thats got nothing to do with masternodes. Bitcoin in a cold wallet is also not "available to trade". Loose change sitting in my pocket is also "not available to trade". The balance of my offset mortgage account is also "not available to trade". None of this has anything to do with liquidity which is a measure of how much the price moves for a given trade which will generally be less for higher marketcap assets.

Even if we use your narrow "how much is in the market" definition, if I right this minute buy 20 BTC worth of XMR I'll move the market by 3.36% according to Bitcoinwisdom whereas in the Dash/BTC market it'll only move 1.58%. So there's your argument blown out of the water right there.

Quote from: Joshuar on March 29, 2015, 09:07:41 PM

I also find this odd: " Why dont you go and ask Evan/Dash developer why he didn't relaunch Dash/DRK after the instamine scam where he and a few others mined over 2million Dash/DRKs on a linux only release, then cut the block reward and coin supply by over half to instantly make those instamined coins more valuable, all while at that time, Dash/DRK had no future goals was just a random Bitcoin clone? You should maybe do that instead of trolling."

Because I've already read his account, your account and every other critic that trolls the Dash thread to kingdom come and made up my mind about what impact that period has on the value of the project. Contrary to what your trying to promote, I'm of the opinion that the current value of that cryptocurrency has far more to do with amount of work he put into it over the last year than the fact he tweaked the block reward back then. You make up your own mind about it but I've sure seen nothing to convince me of anything other than Dash is probably the most investable in the whole market right now.

You obviously do not know what liquidity is or you're somehow interpreting its definition wrong. Why not just admit you're clueless? You keep changing your arguments over and over again when proved wrong. You previously stated that volume had nothing to do with liquidity, which makes abolsutely no sense, but hey, that's what you said. You also lied and said that XMR's liquidity has never been as high as Dash's, to which I took one of your own posts to show your lie, and how XMR's liquidity was actually higher than Dash's before the pump, which is the point I was making in the first place. This is the definition of liquidity, we've gone over it before: The degree to which an asset or security can be bought or sold in the market without affecting the asset's price. Therefore, the # of coins is the biggest determinator of liquidity for a cryptocurrency(Disregarding denominations since they almost never used outside daytrading), Dash keeping more than 50% of it's coins at any given time on masternodes is bad for liquidity. Simple as that, stop lying and trying to manipulate by changing your incorrect arguments, thank you.

I've read his account as well, and he puts it on as if it were a mistake. The problem with that is that if it were a mistake, why was it never owned up to? He could have relaunched the coin without an instamine, but as even your fellow Dash supporters have said, he himself instamined at least 300,000 Dash/DRK. It just comes down to money and greed then, no morals. And, given the extremely low chance that it was a mistake(Which it most likely isnt or he would have relaunched the coin), then thats no excuse for having an instamine where the actual block reward and coin max supply was cut after the fact, by more than half. No excuse.