Quote from: illodin on March 30, 2015, 10:38:36 PM

Quote from: illodin on March 25, 2015, 05:23:39 PM

Quote from: Swandeli on March 25, 2015, 03:46:57 PM

it's implementation of gmaxwell's coinjoin is snotty at best

Can you explain the differences between gmaxwell's coinjoin and Darkcoin's mixing, thanks.

Hi, can you please?

Based on K. Atlas's review only the initial prototype of Darksend was based on gmaxwell's conjoin.
Since RC4 Darksend+is still based on the CoinJoin protocol, but improves user convenience by turning the mixing process into a background, passive (but still online) process. This approach can be described as ahead-of-time (AOT) mixing, as opposed to the customary just-in-time (JIT) mixing typical of most CoinJoin implementations today.
And, as far as I know, the traditional Coinjoin relies on a centralized unity, whilst Dash's mixing relies on p2p nodes (MNs).
So saying darksend is a broken coinjoin implementation is a false statement, correct me if I am wrong.