Quote from: illodin on March 30, 2015, 11:28:56 PM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on March 30, 2015, 11:24:59 PM

Quote from: illodin on March 30, 2015, 11:21:55 PM

Quote from: Joshuar on March 30, 2015, 11:02:50 PM

Quote from: illodin on March 30, 2015, 10:47:21 PM

Quote from: Johnny Mnemonic on March 30, 2015, 10:43:43 PM

short of DASH abandoning the bitcoin codebase and adopting a more opaque block chain.

Might happen, who knows. Evan is known for making big moves quite swiftly.

Just like Evan said he'd be implementing Ring Signatures back in May-June of 2014, then it got totally scrapped?

You're slightly odd character I must say. I can't put my finger on it, but you often seem to ask questions I don't quite understand. It's like you're referring to something I haven't said. Is it the language barrier? Or were you just dropped on your head one time too many as a child?

Quick, attack the attacker!

Discuss the attacker's personality and biography! Change the topic away from Even's scrapped promise to implement ring signatures!

Just like XMR and XCN weren't launched with highly unoptimized miners to allow insiders to mine with unfair hashrates?

See?

No, still wrong. But at least you're now doing better than discussing personalities and biographies.

XMR's block reward schedule has never changed, and actual emission matches exactly the software spec.

Dark OTOH, changed its block reward schedule twice and no spec which accounts for actual emission exists.

Hell, Evan can still unilaterally chance those constants. And you not only accept that, but try to spin it as a Good Thing.

Once a coin launches, all's fair in love and mining.

But Dark's dev played games with, and/or bungled, his coin's launch. So instead of C/ASM/OCL nerds like DGA being properly rewarded for their optimizations, insider traders like Masternode reaped the benefits of the bizarre, inexplicably huge early block rewards.