Quote from: Ullo on April 06, 2015, 08:00:34 PM

Quote from: bit73 on April 06, 2015, 07:35:06 PM

Good to see progress in Bytecoin development. Are you planning to bring Bytecoin into SuperNet or Blocknet? I tested SuperNET beta recently and it is looks very promising. Blocknet is still in early stage but could be an option, too.

We've communicated with SuperNET previously and we might consider working closer with it in the future.

Quote from: heyhey-u on April 06, 2015, 07:36:10 PM

ok, bytecoin devs. awesome! a lot of technical things were done. but, you know, i'm still too noobish to understand that. what is the purpose to use iwallet? who needs itransactions? if i'm an owner of super-cool-online-store "buy whatever for bytecoin" which one do i need to use?

This 1.0.3 Bytecoin reference client release is dev-oriented, so as a user you won't be able to notice the difference right now. I guess GUI Wallet (coming out later this week) will be more attractive to you. And if you are a merchant willing to accept Bytecoins, your solution is payment gateway (coming out with v.1.0.4), not C++ API libraries.

Quote from: darthcoin on April 06, 2015, 07:29:28 PM

Is it possible to switch between IWallet and ITransactions? Will it give any advantages to the user?

Yes, it is possible to utilize both IWallet and ITransaction inside your application. There are no advantages or disadvantages, as you should use the proper library for your particular requirements. If you're willing to just send the transaction out-of-box, then use IWallet. If you need to implement a complicated logic of input selection, your choice is ITransaction.

thx bytecoin dev