Quote from: Melbustus on March 22, 2015, 03:30:16 AM

Quote from: SlipperySlope on March 11, 2015, 03:10:08 AM

The company is the sole miner of AI Coin. The 7,200 aicoins created each day will be sold on an exchange or otherwise directly paid for expenses.
...

Wait... What happened to:

Quote from: SlipperySlope on April 27, 2014, 01:45:10 AM

Quote from: Peter R on April 26, 2014, 07:43:25 PM

Will the initial distribution of wealth in Bitcoin-PoS be exactly as per the unspent outputs in the bitcoin blockchain at a certain point in time in the future, or will you consider redistribution of wealth if you find popular support for it?

I would keep the blockchain as is....

Edit: cuz I'll support a project which preserves the effective scarcity of bitcoin (if the tech, etc, is good), thereby supporting the idea that cryptocurrency can be scarce and therefore valuable.

But if you are creating an alt-coin that doesn't tie into bitcoin's ledger (ie, the utxo-set), you are directly attacking the notion of crypto-scarcity, and therefore the idea that crypto-currency can be good money. In which case I will vocally not support this project. And FWIW, I've been approached in the real-world by your representatives.

I also read it that A.I. Coin would tie into bitcoin's ledger (ie, the utxo-set). I'm disappointed its turned into another IPO. Another IPO/ICO is the last thing most people want considering all the rip offs over the previous 12 months.