Quote from: altcoinUK on April 09, 2015, 08:30:47 AM

Quote from: Daedelus on April 09, 2015, 08:15:03 AM

Quote from: altcoinUK on April 09, 2015, 08:07:19 AM

...handful NXT founders who created the original 73 shill accounts doesn't change...

Links?

FYI, after two months there were ~103 who were actually eligible for a stake but who didn't bother to claim it. I guess that is Nxt's fault too.

Fuck off with your requests about links, all right? I am a very patient and polite man, but when a well know scammer like yourself who has been promoting a well know scam asking from me evidence instead of providing evidence that the operation is not a scam then that is quite irrational, don't you think?

Send me a link about where your fucking useless NXT assets - that you have been selling really-really hard to newbies, idiots and naive investors - used in real world, and then we continue talking about why sensible people are sceptical about your countless vapourwares and fantasy projects (I give it you it is not a fantasy from your viewpoint as you scam people for real money, but terms of use cases the projects/assets are in fantasy land)

Quote

Fuck off with your requests about links, all right? I am a very patient and polite man,

I notice a contradiction... Cheesy

Quote

asking from me evidence instead of providing evidence that the operation is not a scam then that is quite irrational, don't you think?

No, it is basic logic. You can't prove a negative. If I said "Prove green isn't green", you would say "It is up to you to prove green isn't green, you're making the claim. All evidence suggests the contrary, green is green".

It is up to you to prove something with evidence, as you're making the claim. But I don't think that is why you're here. Has there been too much good news in Nxt for you in the last couple of days? Wink

While researching the evidence, please provide evidence that I am "a well known scammer" and where I have been selling anything "really really hard". Thanks for your time Cheesy