Quote from: el kaka22 on April 13, 2015, 12:46:18 PM

Quote from: redsn0w on April 13, 2015, 12:40:17 PM

Quote from: Bitcoiner7788 on April 13, 2015, 12:14:04 PM

I would vote no. Because I am just a newbie (now) and I can't upload an avatar. Also many people having the same avatar is a really bad thing.

It will not be a problem because everyone will be allowed to keep his own avatar and add to the left/right side the logo of the service, or at least this is the best thing to do in my honest opinion. However you should only to be active and wait to be a full member and after you will be able to put an avatar. If you don't want to wait, buy a full member account from some buyers in the "Digital goods" section.

Quote from: NOT-newbie on April 13, 2015, 12:26:51 PM

I would vote for 'Yes/No' if it exists. Avatar is something personal and should be unique among users. So a paid campaign should buy less than 50% of someone's avatar. That's enough.

Also the signature is something personal but someone has invented the sig. campaign and this is the first forum I have seen that allow you to sell the signature place.

Nope. The current campaign requires the whole space. See the identical avatars posted there.
BTW, how can someone BUY an account from a BUYER??
What I am looking is not only a higher payout, but also a more personal advertising avatar.

Sorry, fixed. I meant the dadice and bit-x signature campaign, them could allow you (probable) to keep your avatar and add the site logo to the left or right side.

About that campaign (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1021711.0) it is really insane sell own avatar for 0.016 btc/month.