Quote from: redsn0w on April 14, 2015, 11:05:02 AM

Quote from: erwin45hacked on April 13, 2015, 02:17:38 PM

Quote from: redsn0w on April 13, 2015, 01:38:34 PM

Quote from: erwin45hacked on April 13, 2015, 01:26:27 PM

Quote from: redsn0w on April 13, 2015, 12:52:33 PM

About that campaign (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1021711.0) it is really insane sell own avatar for 0.016 btc/month.

Insane in term of too cheap or too expensive? for me the rate is pretty cheap for a month, although the avatar does not contain a clickable link, it is worth for few people to milk every penny for their posts

It is too cheap in my honest opinion, an avatar can 'bring' more visit ((also if it is clickable) respect than a signature, because an avatar appears more than a sig ad (by the way this is only my personal opinion, and a good rate could be 0.10 btc per month).

I do think the rate is decent, since the picture isnt clickable, but an avatar + signature could be a better campaign since an avatar will actually show a part of the sites, and the link in the signatures is clickable and it is weird to see someone using A sites signature campaign, B sites Personal message campaign and C sites avatar campaign

I think that rate is not decent, up to 0.016 btc/ month to rent your avatar space? As I said previously, an avatar is more noticeable than a signature, I think 0.10 btc/per month is a good and right rate.

0.1BTC is a lot solely for an avatar, even more if it's only part of an avatar.