Quote from: kingcolex on April 14, 2015, 05:20:40 PM

Quote from: quakefiend420 on April 14, 2015, 04:57:50 PM

Quote from: Spondoolies-Tech on April 14, 2015, 03:15:55 PM

Quote from: dogie on April 14, 2015, 03:12:18 PM

Quote from: klondike_bar on April 14, 2015, 01:15:44 PM

Quote from: valkir on April 14, 2015, 12:00:19 PM

If the j/gh ratio is real, this is gonna be a game changer! Grin

it wont be. guarenteed thats at the lowest voltage/frequency, and probably for just the chip (doesnt include regulator loss, PSU loss, other power draws like a controller/fan)

realisticlaly in a final product, this would probably range 0.28W-0.50W depending on settings (ie: similar to the Bitmain chip)

Agreed, looks extremely similar power consumption to the S5's chip on sha256 mode. The scrypt mode looks more appealing, and we don't yet know what we'll be able to do in dual mining modes. If its anything like the gen 1 chips then I don't think many people will dual mine.

Dogie, I think it's high time you'll put a disclaimer about your BitmainTech affiliation somewhere in your signature or personal text.

+1 Power consumption actually appears to be about 20% lower on-chip that the BM1384.

Yeah there should be a small note that's he is affiliated it does seem to be skewing his post.

That said, 15-20% lower on chip level isn't really a 'revolution in mining' and certainly won't make people all of a sudden invest in mass quantities of hardware (especially larger operations with minimal power costs where the acquisition cost of hardware is the bulk of the capital outlay).