A lot of the evidence is compelling.
What would have been their motive?
This is crazy talk. I reviewed several of the source documents linked to and found nothing. Just routine police work.
As the source material does not support the narrative, I conclude it is a fabricated narrative. Now why would you willingly go along with propagating untruths?
I had started a thread on 911 and saw this thread which links to some material a lot of people believe. The fact that the poster and the link use the phrase "did 911", as I did, means they are probably also new yorkers.
Could you give some examples of "the source material [that] does not support the narrative"? Some of the material has been widely reported in the alternative media and is well documented. Are you saying that the poster added some trash?
The several I read were just regular cop style reports (FBI etc no dif) "checked out these dudes, blah blah blah" after 9/11 they probably "checked out" 50,000 or more ... they were all madder than hornets.