Who fairly deserve the remaining escrowed funds in your opinion?
Despite whatever ethical arguments anyone has - the remaining escrowed funds should be given as per outlined by the original escrow agreement (usually the original owner of the funds). Not doing so (even while it might be viewed as justice for scammers) would be a violation of an agreement, meaning an escrow can't be trusted to do what they agree upon.
I understand your writing. But an escrow has to prevent crime like all other people should do!
Otherwise i can fund a escrow for helping me to rob a bank. (But i shouldn't call it helping.) I can give him money that he pay people who talk with the bank and security personal while i open the safe by a illegal way and rob the money of all. (Also the money of the people who are paid by my escrow). Do you think i will come back to my escrow to get the remaining funds? No, i have no reason, because i have much money as before. The escrow agreement is the thing for the purpose and i have misused the escrows honesty for my own profit.
And i am sure the escrow will contact the police after such a case happened. But maybe not if i have a hidden deal with the escrow and the remaining fund are high enough for him.
But finally it is more worth, if the escrow show trust to thousands of people and violate his agreement that he have with only one. This could be the best and honest promotion him and his future activity. There is nothing unethical or unfair. And it would be fair... Because the scammer "CryptoSplit" has violated an agreement before and has scammed a lot of people.
Surly not i. But hey, it is not fairly if someone try to pay others with robbed money. Especially if he know or find out that it was stolen...
And then he try to make deals to pay less of the stolen money!
Please think about your comment and think about who you try to protect with your comment.
He is doing what looks to a fair resolution - the signature campaign has ended with the closure of the site and he's paying you for all the days you were present in the campaign. Just because you choose to advertise beyond that point doesn't mean you are owed anything. Secondly, unless he has a clear intention to keep the coins - I wouldn't assume he's try to avoid paying out - he's following what makes sense and is fair - your being paid for the term of the agreement which has been cut short.
Finally, once again it isn't simply just because OP is a scammer that you can claim a full payment. It is irrelevant - you are being paid for the services you rendered and the time course - which has been shortened and hence a shortened payment.
Honestly, you can keep trying all you like - I don't hear anyone else agreeing.
And here, please read my and all the other posts in the whole thread. Then you should understand that here is something wrong.
And if i look at your last post, i can see you have searched the address with the funds on the blockchain. If the escrow really want to give the money back, he can do this by sending it to the address where the money comes from.
I don't think that Mr. Quickseller looks for a fair resolution. He is not a fair guy! Please read my posts before. He give negative feedback to people who never contacted him!
Why do you mean that he is fair and following what makes sense?
And the term of agreement is editable at any time. I said this before.
I don't like talk with you about nonsense. You only support the acting of the escrow and i don't ask why!
Thanks again for your meaning and comments. But they don't help to find a fair solution.