Quote from: RoadStress on April 20, 2015, 10:23:43 PM

It seems that 55PH/s antpool doesn't qualify for the FF = operates own large mining farm.

FF was retired about 6 months ago, its too speculative / arbitrary to what is a big farm and what isn't. Even Bitmain's farms look small compared to Bitfury's, ASICMiner has more than Spondoolies etc etc but they're all big farms.

Quote

Changelog 10/20/2014
KNC Miner Ethics, F up from FF (-4 to -2) - removed FF criteria from rating system due to being potentially speculative.

Quote from: RoadStress on April 20, 2015, 10:23:43 PM

The tons of dust on some batches of miners doesn't qualify for P = evidence of premining on preordered equipment

P stopped being used god knows how long ago, far before even this series of change logs.

Quote from: RoadStress on April 20, 2015, 10:23:43 PM

Also the unethical behaviour of which you can't speak due to your NDA can't qualify for a O = other generic unethical behaviour.

Now you're just saying things for the sake of it. As I explained in detail in the last post, this has NOTHING to do with any NDA with me. Talk to Guy, its his information to reveal. And as I said last time, even if there wasn't this mess surrounding it it still wasn't particularly useful information for this guide.

Quote from: RoadStress on April 20, 2015, 10:23:43 PM

Quote from: dogie on April 19, 2015, 04:04:33 PM

5) My NDA with Bitmain allows for disclosures of confidential information, non maliciously. That means I am free to do 99.9% of what the community requires. The NDA is primarily there to stop the selling of trade secrets / information not known to the market.

Well revealing some unethical behaviour would be considered maliciously so you simply can't do it because of your boss restrains. Knew that already.

No, no it wouldn't. But yes of course you "knew that already", you're here to argue rather than do anything constructive.

Quote from: RoadStress on April 20, 2015, 10:23:43 PM

Quote from: dogie on April 19, 2015, 04:04:33 PM

I think you need to reread what you wrote. You're saying that I purposely delayed a reduction in "a direct competitor of Bitmain". Huh

That's exactly what I am saying. Because in December Bitmain needed more help with the ratings/sales than in September. It's not rocket science.

Not sure if you're purposely not reading what you said or trolling....