Quote from: WORE on April 22, 2015, 04:35:33 AM

Quote from: wr104 on April 17, 2015, 12:52:46 PM

Quote from: wand_reader on April 17, 2015, 10:26:40 AM

what's the status of android wallet development? Huh

It is finally coming along.

Porting the existing BTC wallets to support all the KHC features (320bit hashes, ed25519 signatures, etc) has been harder than what I originally expected.

Hey man! I hope things are going well and not to poke a stick or anything but KHC is trading at 60-80 sats and doing so under the new more power hungry algo, that would be <100. I happen to be single for a while now and biting my fingernails is not exactly an attractive habit, dude please, for the love of... err... self... if you have a wallet on the mobile side close please beta test it. There ain't shit out there that can compete with the algo, gotta strut some of ur stuff man.

I hear ya!

Sometimes, I wish I didn't go this far with all the enhancements and features that I added to KHC, features that only a handful of people would appreciate anyway.
With pretty much any other alt-coin over here, you can just grab someone else's mobile wallet source code, change the name, the logo, do few tweaks here and there and voilà! You have a brand new Android Wallet. This isn't the case with KHC.

To make things worse, I was originally porting the well-known Mycelium BTC wallet to KHC. Once I was almost done making changes and I began testing it, I realized that by design it won't connect to the P2P network like a normal wallet does. Instead, it connects to special backend servers running some WAPI services for the transactions. This is a big "NO" for KHC since, I want all my Wallets to use ONLY the P2P network.

I'm now working on one based on Schildbach which doesn't require a centralized backend. Hopefully, I can have a Beta .apk in the next two weeks.