Quote from: bryant.coleman on April 22, 2015, 05:17:46 AM

Quote from: Bizmark13 on April 22, 2015, 04:54:20 AM

According to the chart, there is still a good 3-4 months between the sale to Karpeles and before the coins started to go missing. It does show that McCaleb probably didn't have anything to do with the collapse though.

Read my post again. I wasn't accusing McCaleb of stealing the coins. He is a honest man. Karpeles was the one who stole the coins. He just waited for 3-4 months before stealing them. That's all.

Yeah, I didn't think you were accusing McCaleb of stealing the coins. I was just pointing out that the evidence exonerates him from being the one responsible since he had nothing to do with the exchange when the coins started to go missing.

Quote from: Kprawn on April 22, 2015, 05:39:45 AM

This is similar to a case in the fiat banking sector, where a employee took a few cents from millions of accounts over a long period. These transactions never raised any flags, because nobody cared about a few cents.

After a few years these cents accumalated to a few million dollars and the employee were caught when he tried to withdraw the funds. {The withdraw limits, raised the red flags}

People tend to be very creative, when it comes to stealing someone else's money. Angry

That's only true for the second half of the chart since it suggests that the majority of the coins were lost/stolen in a short period of time early on.