Quote from: TracerX on April 22, 2015, 07:59:52 PM

Quote from: Mr Felt on April 22, 2015, 01:56:48 PM

Based on the amount of mistakes in that complaint, GAW may have a chance at winning this suit unless the power company changes attorneys. First sentence of the complaint contains a glaring mistake (Comes now Defendant . . . and files this complaint against Defendant). Also, federal courts use case numbers, not cause numbers. I pulled the case up on Pacer - why is the power company's counsel filing entries of appearances almost a week after filing the complaint when complaints themselves are entries of appearance for plaintiffs represented by counsel?

BTW, for those are interested, no Answer or Motion to Dismiss has been filed by GAW as of this morning. Its not clear whether there has been service yet as no affidavit of service has been filed either. I could imagine the power company having not served the complaint yet, especially if they're worried about a discharge via bankruptcy or something.

IANAL, but I know more than I would like to admit. Typos in filings happen frequently, and they are either amended or (more likely) the mistakes aren't even bothered with. These little things will have no bearing on the suit.

Legal documents that do require more proof reading are mineral rights and land titles, for obvious reasons.

Totally. See my previous post in this thread. Was going for some levity.