Quote from: jimmothy on April 25, 2015, 10:04:30 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on April 25, 2015, 09:54:12 PM

If we consider just the technical side the best thing to do would be to burn the stake and keep the principal coins locked up, until a fork is developed that gets rid of the unbalanced inflation. Not distribute to the users. Burning the stake would reduce the inflation and keeping the controllers would allow Cryptsy to still participate in the voting. But with only 3 votes I'm not sure it's really worth risking the bad publicity.

I thought cryptsy was only gifted 1 PC?

And why not burn 100% of the coins? Is there a reason that burning all the coins until the PC is empty would remove their imaginary voting rights?

Why are PC's imaginary voting rights even being taken seriously?

Cryptsy were planning to get 3 PCs, it was posted a few pages back. Edit: he mentions it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.msg11194663#msg11194663

I don't know if burning the coins would remove voting rights - if not then sure, burn them. As for taking them seriously - no clue, that's why it's prefixed with "If we consider just the technical side". Burning the stake would at least somewhat reduce the inflation, as opposed to what mullick was suggesting, i.e. sharing the gains with users. If the principal can be burned too - even better. It only cost them $1 after all.