Quote from: BlockaFett on April 28, 2015, 03:21:06 PM

Quote from: arielbit on April 28, 2015, 03:03:20 PM

Quote from: Gliss on April 28, 2015, 11:28:14 AM

Given the debate here, it's probably best to take the significantly premined mark off of Dash until we can figure out a more appropriate solution. I agree that instamine is not the same as premine.

I see a few options here:
1) Change label to "Significantly mined around launch" or something among those lines
2) Make an instamine label
3) Not care about tracking instamine

I'm preferring #3 because "instamine" is not a well defined term and can be applied subjectively.

how about...

4) significantly instamined

the "significantly" would make it non-subjective. if we look at this graph, there is a "significance factor"

Nice Graph Ariel, maybe CMC can start to analyze all coin emission curves and try to figure out which is instant or not, and explain fairly in each case why it happened, and how much of a threat it is, to keep their impartiality and maintain the trust level they worked hard to achieve.

Just FYI but look at the Monero price chart - the more you and the other goons try to bully CMC to change their own definitions for your gain, the more people dump. It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic - why don't you leave Gliss alone and go develop your own coin please...

we are presenting ideas in how to label your scam coin in CMC, you are simply derailing the thread with your useless rant..bigrcanada is already saying "proudly instamined"

as i said earlier there is a "significance factor" and it can be sub categorized like..

Dash $ 15,935,866 $ 2.99 5,321,001 DASH ^inst

the "inst" can be clicked and a pop up graph shows this..

so.. at the bottom of CMC there will be

* Not Mineable
** Significantly Premined
^inst Significantly Instamined

this way instamined scam coins won't be CMC resistant.