Quote from: coins101 on April 29, 2015, 07:55:26 AM

Quote from: smooth on April 29, 2015, 07:23:22 AM

Quote from: coins101 on April 29, 2015, 07:22:18 AM

Quote from: arielbit on April 29, 2015, 05:14:00 AM

i suggests this..

Dash $ 15,935,866 $ 2.99 5,321,001 DASH ^inst ^blck

at the bottom of CMC there will be

* Not Mineable
** Significantly Premined
^inst Significantly Instamined
^blck block reward changed

this way instamined scam coins and block reward changing scams won't be CMC resistant.

Please then also add

^crip Launched with de-optimized or crippled code

That is historically factual, and admitted by the project and its devs.

It's not objective, which is what Gliss said he wants. Take Monero for example. We think it was crippled, but who is to say. Maybe the original developers were just retarded, or maybe we don't even know what we're talking about. Moreover, who is going to evaluate all these mining functions from various coins and make a determination. It isn't something that can be determined objectively by a simple rule (or at all).

Quote from: smooth on April 28, 2015, 01:11:58 AM

We've admitted to the crippled miner. We were the first ones to discover it, disclose it, and fix it. The reason I don't dwell on Monero's faults is not to hide them......

Just putting that comment into context.

Not wishing to dwell on it.

Obviously, as I said, in the case of Monero, we believe (subjectively) it was deliberate. But this isn't about Monero, it is about what coinmarketcap should track and report. There is nothing objective about it, and can't be applied broadly to a database of coins in any rational manner.

Let's stop discussing Monero or any specific coins here and stick to discussing what can be objectively reported by coinmarketcap that would be useful to people who are looking at a large database of coins.