Because I don't know the official public launch time for Dash. There were several statedIf it was mined before et
When I asked you yesterday about the evidence you provided for a "premine", you said there was none. You provided evidence of a instamine cloaked as a premine. If the two are not the same why do you keep playing word games??
I already explained that I can't figure out what Dash was
because it didn't have a well-specified public launch time.
How can we tell if it was mined before its public launch if we can't figure out when that public launch was?
Anyway, let's move on. Obviously it isn't a clear enough premine to count as such for the purpose of coinmarketcap, which tends to want very specific and objective evidence for such things.
You are playing word games in an attempt to push your agenda. This self fulfilling righteous witch hunt to rid crypto of scams and protect investors means nothing when you yourself cannot be honest in your intent. The fact you continue to play these charades further proves you have no honest intent and you are not objective. These actions are what turns your so called honest concerns into pure trolling. You're only goal is to continue to bash dash in a feeble attempt to make monero some how look better.
I can think of several other coins, monero not one of those, right now that could and should be on your list but you only have your sights set on one. If you were truly objective and worried about the safety of investors, why ignore the other coins with issues too?
I comment on what I know about, which at this point is obviously going to be coins that are more "visible" from the Monero perspective. If you want to share some of these other coins that are major scams and should be pursued as such, feel free to let me know about them. Obviously I don't have unlimited time but I do promise to at least take an honest look at what you give me. Fair enough?