Quote from: CryptoCoin2015 on May 01, 2015, 12:02:05 AM

Quote from: JaredR26 on April 30, 2015, 11:31:53 PM

They attempted to operate your equipment per the contract and the heat it produced damaged it. They are not criminally liable for this by any law. This is a civil and contractual dispute. I know you aren't in the U.S., but do you really not have this concept of civil court versus criminal court? Theft versus contractual dispute?

I give you a couple hints here, legal lessons for free: the contract is void, due to their inability to perform in the first place. It has been virtually impossible for them to fulfill.
Your lawyer will explain the rest to you. Or wikipedia. Where ever you get your knowledge from these days.

Judge: "So you are claiming that these individuals are not actual hosters for these servers?"
You: "Yes your honor, as we have shown, these individuals clearly made an agreement with the full knowledge that they were and are incapable of fulfilling it, and -"
Judge: "Wait, hold on. They were hosting for others before you, right?"
You: "Well yes, but they-"
Judge: "And today, months later, they are still hosting for others, right?"
You: "Well, yes but they-"
Judge: "Case dismissed. Next plaintiff."

Quote

Again, you mix up things where you have no idea how the legal system works: I have at no time given up my ownership of anything. This is like you claiming, that a car parked in a parking garage is during that time the property of the parking garage owner. This is pure nonsense.

Quote

I'd love to see what you'd say to a tow company or impound lot after they tow your car. Plz do and uploads to youtube kthx.

Quote from: JaredR26 on April 30, 2015, 11:31:53 PM

Both sides are in default. In my opinion you should get part of your money back, probably most, but I am in no position to judge how much and don't want to be. That's why we have courts.

Jeez, you are contradicting yourself in two sentences: First, you claim both sides are at fault, then you state, that you are in no position to judge at all. Stick to the latter, please!

Next two words after judge: "how much"

Quote

Quote

Asicspace has not blundered.
I'm not sure what you call a long network outage followed by high temperatures on a hot day, but I'm pretty sure someone screwed up somewhere. If they had criminal intent they would have taken everything from everyone and fled. But they are still there, still mining, and they still have paying customers, some happy, some unhappy. What part of that doesn't sound like a blunder?

Again: You are the customer any criminal wishes for. I have seen plenty of your type during the boiler room days.

The intent, the sole intent of the whole operation is not to deliver services.

And yet every day that others get said services as agreed your criminal accusations look like nonsense.

Quote

It is to screw their customers over and over and over again.

Be it that the miners are set to mine into their own pockets. Be it, that they deliver less power than paid for. Be it, that they manage and administrate the property of other parties recklessly with no regards to ownership.

Oh my, you read the future from bent plastic?

Quote

This is all the big picture and the driver behind this is criminal intent.

A blunder is an accident. This "blunder" however is an event that happened due to a gamble: the gamble from their sides, whether they could despite their lack of knowledge and technical capabilities deliver a contract that they had nearly no means for to deliver.

https://i.imgur.com/lI37y37.jpg

Now I'm not an esteemed criminal justice major like yourself, sir, but that to me looks like $200,000 worth of means and intent to deliver. Which would make this a civil/contractual dispute.

Quote

And which they knew.

At the moment they accepted that gamble, they were hiding the truth, lying and cheating. They did this with intent and hence they did this with criminal energy. Fraud.

They were desperate to get the deal, desperate enough to not care what would have been best in both interests and reckless, when the time would have been right to take responsibility and get things straight again.

Reckless enough that they didn't have a licensed electrical engineer design the electrical. Oh wait, they did. Oh well, reckless enough that they didn't have a licensed HVAC contractor design and build the cooling.

Oh wait. They did. What part of this is not a civil/contractual dispute, exactly?