Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 23, 2012, 02:47:39 AM

Quote from: notme on August 23, 2012, 02:45:55 AM

Quote from: Vladimir on August 23, 2012, 01:50:25 AM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 23, 2012, 01:12:43 AM

Quote from: muyuu on August 23, 2012, 01:11:12 AM

Quote from: Matthew N. Wright on August 23, 2012, 01:05:47 AM

Wouldn't someone have to break a contract and have no intention to pay to be considered a scammer? Has there been a contract broken? Is there implied intention to pay?

Yes. I know you have a lax understanding of what a deadline is, but Pirate failed to repay bitlane on time and then again on his second self-given deadline. That's a broken contract already, regardless of possible future mitigation.

Fair enough. I suppose he does deserve a scammer tag at least until he pays.

Could we maybe instead have "naive and greedy" tag for all the pirate's "investors". This way all the new (and old) scammers could concetrate on working those marks and leave the rest of this forum alone maybe? Just a thought... Wink

Yup... I'm so greedy I paid out my pass through customers from my personal funds even though my terms say I only owed them 25% until pirate paid up. All together, I paid out 189% of what was paid in to me. But sure throw us all together and make blanket statements.

This is what the purpose of the bet is, to allow them the right to make blanket accusations. If they're right, they win big. If they're wrong, they'll make less blanket accusations in the future cause I got their rent moneyz herp derp

Except 'ol Vlady hasn't put his money down Tongue

.