Quote from: suchmoon on May 01, 2015, 05:30:00 PM

Quote from: mullick on May 01, 2015, 05:12:23 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on May 01, 2015, 05:02:58 PM

Quote from: kken01 on May 01, 2015, 04:43:43 PM

i didnt say they were cryptsy. just checked the keys with mullicks tool http://www.primeblocks.com/

http://i.snag.gy/BgVBM.jpg

If I'm reading this right, key 100:4 is staking multiple wallets:

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PCWq4tNwM51bi8TPQvcAaeqf32uEPUZKo8 (compounding, e.g. block 153506)

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PVZv2eW5Ug5hmTgNUdya4douc6SiK4Mva4
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PJChrTBYLKrwizXr4NQa222AFpiyGYCfDW
and others
(non-compounding, e.g. block 153844)

Is this one of the leaked keys? I thought it's not but now I'm not sure.

It looks like it was one of the leaked keys. 10 keys at the 100% rate were leaked. And there is only 10 100% keys

Either someone at gaw, the foundation or the xpy dev team isnt playing by the "rules". Or someone with a lot of paycoin is using one of the leaked keys

It could be whoever hacked the paycoin web wallet as I don't believe all of those coins were recovered. And I don't see anyone buying 125k paycoin to stake at 100%

The keys could have been leaked just so those wallets can compound their stake and they could brush it off as stolen keys

Compounding started on the 27th. When did the leak first became public? It should also be possible to backtrack where the 125k coins in the compounding wallets originated from. There can't be that many sources for that amount of coins. E.g.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PC7sy9JhWS42Hy3ZLpCFUZ6SfDgvHPP1vJ.htm

Edit: I see PR is on it already

They were make public April 25, in this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.msg11195163#msg11195163