Quote from: miaviator on May 01, 2015, 08:55:19 PM

Quote from: Paul Revere on May 01, 2015, 03:33:56 PM

Another thing worthy of note on the Paycoin Blockchain: At least 3 PC addresses are not playing along with the pretend rule that PC's must scrape stake to avoid (much) compounding. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/#!rich

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?319632.htm #11
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?320305.htm #12
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?320307.htm #13

Quote from: Paul Revere on May 01, 2015, 08:43:27 PM

Addresses (referring to the current Rich List rank) #11 (currently compounding) and #31 (not currently compounding) are both using key "100:4" right now, and addresses 12,13, (compounding) and 30 (not compounding) are using key "100:10". I have not yet been able to verify that there are actually >50 addresses staking @ 100% yet though.

Direct
https://btclendtalk.org/topic/50/aparently-some-leaked-prime-controller-keys-are-staking-btclend-coins

Archive
https://archive.is/Jp9VY

Any relation?

Holy Shit. Looks like my amateur rooting around exposed this scamdog (and his partner Homero) using the released keys. Errrr, exposed that some nasty person hacked into BTClend and started using the released Hyperstake keys on their coins. Darned hooligans!

What does "someone staking BTClend coins" even mean? If someone has access to the wallet, why would they not just take them? We are supposed to believe that someone hacked in and is staking their coins at an increased rate for them?? WTF? This Cmilian is a more pathetic liar than his scamdog hero Homero. I was curious about whether that big source address that the coins in those traced backed to might be BTClend. Only so many entities with that much XPY.

Play it again JB!