Quote from: Rotary Sausage on May 13, 2015, 06:30:42 AM

Quote from: celestio on May 13, 2015, 01:25:54 AM

Quote from: Rotary Sausage on May 13, 2015, 12:48:15 AM

Quote from: Wilikon on May 12, 2015, 12:32:48 AM

Quote from: thebenjamincode on May 12, 2015, 12:25:19 AM

is that information true? where did you get that?
it would be amazing if everyone could live longer

Step back. Remember were you are: Bitcoin Forum > Other > Politics & Society > "Most people could live past 130 if they choose to, while aging very little _ No I won't tell you how..."

Let's cut to the chase. Where can I send my bitcoins to know the answer?

Cool

Not so fast. I would love to oblige you, but I rather you learn of my honesty and insight first.
I am the real deal, but I can be anyone and full of crap so stay tuned. There are just too many
human expressions that have been belittled through fraudulent top-down approved cultural manipulations.
This is too good of a topic for me to lie or troll.

Quote from: celestio on May 12, 2015, 12:59:13 PM

Quote from: coinpr0n on May 12, 2015, 10:10:59 AM

I'm supposing it's relating to this guy: Aubrey de Grey (wikipedia). He's a professor at Oxford I think who has been researching regenerative medicine: cleansing cells + healthy living, so as to extend life. Is this it OP?

Healthy living only does so much to extend your life, nowhere near the "past 130 if they choose to", and you will age accordingly(So you will be "old and wrinkly" at age 90 for example no matter how healthy you are).

The only things I know of that can actually potentially reverse or temporary stop aging is Stem cells, nanomedicine(Such as enzymes that somehow "replenish" cells, or discovering how to apply Henrietta Lack's "immortal cells" to stop aging in everyone else(As telomores are thought to be the thing that as they shrink do to every cell splitting, cause aging of the cell and eventual death of said cell, that's ceased however in the case of "immortal cells").

Then there's robotics and the prospect of "transforming" the human body with robotic machinery.

Your opinion is based on mainstream science and culture. Mostly for money grabbing and TV fluff leading people with
false hope and steering them into the hands of the Administrative State ultimately. I am well aware of the
concepts you have mentioned, but this is only part of the awareness required for what I will elaborate on in
this thread.

By the way, how many times have you been in resthomes to study the elderly? I have seen many resthome
patients who are 80 - 90 with baby smooth skin and less wrinkles than a 50 year old. These people unfortunately
have been captured by the state and have little opportunity to be aware of their own biology. Now imagine the worst
case scenario of my interest, where if these same people were well nourished via modern nutritional understandings
for most of their life on top of their genetic predisposition to look fairly healthy at such ages. There are great changes
available for people now! But you must be willing to deprogram yourself and expand your conscious awareness. Its
a growing and learning experience.

Unfortunately you're entirely wrong. The older you age the less collagen your skin has so your statament of " I have seen many resthome patients who are 60-90 with baby smooth skin" is hopelessly false. It's been proven time and time again that dietary habits and nutrition does nothing for the appearance of your skin. The biggest factors of skin aging is The Sun, UVA/UVB Rays, and Nicotine(Smoking). The Sun destroys the collagen that keeps your skin plump and smooth in appearance, and Nicotine restricts the blood vessels in your skin leading it to become more prone to dryness and subsequent wrinkles.

Healthy Living only does so much to improve your lifespan, by a few measly years. Of course that is important as it's better to be generally healthy and fit that unhealthy and restricted(physically). But, when it comes to actually improving your lifespan itself, it doesn't do much and certainly not 130+ years and above like the OP has mentioned. I really hope you guys don't believe in that nonsense that has been refuted time and time again, but it more seems like the OP is one of those snakeoil salesmen trying to sell the next "life extension product" to gain a few bucks(Would also explain why he refuses to elaborate on any of his "points").

No dude. You are. Like I said, you are basing your opinions on mainstream fluff cultural opinions on these matters.
You must be reading from Cosmopolitan magazine haha. If you aren't, then you are parroting the same BS of so called "settled science".
I've helped some aging women get rid of their wrinkles by increasing collagen production and providing dietary/supplementary options
to increase the amount of UVA/UVB blockage in the skin(skin actually needs UV exposure, but this process of exposure is tightly regulated
and prone to reduced function with age and nutritional deficiencies of course). Ever heard of carotinoids? I guess not. This is only one of many things
that greatly reduce solar emissions from damaging DNA. The sun is NOT the biggest factor in skin aging. That is a bunch of propaganda
for those who are unaware of how to properly nourish their body. Common sense would tell you if you've looked at sun exposure,
age, ethnicity and diet, that collagen level decline with age is not consistent across the populations of the world. As well as other
sun exposure protecting factors. It is a fact that you can freely look up, that metal based sun block increases risk of cancer. Well duh!
Many of these sun screen creams and sprays act like solar panels to an extent, and energetically overload the cells causing
reduced function and proneness to malignancy. Learn about electronegativity and photon interaction. Mind blow.

There is a lovely saying "you are a racist if you haven't educated yourself as to why you're not". Now I'm not
calling you a racist obviously, but to be so ignorant of aging traits across various ethnic groups for example is
somewhat racially insensitive. You certainly had a hard settled opinion about at least one ethnic group in
mind when you said what you did. Or are you the silly type who bought into the phrase created by a
wonderful gentleman of Jewish ancestry who said "race is only skin deep". Who later recanted this statement
and based on genetic facts, made a statement about how Jews are an ethnically distinct people. As are all major
and minor ethnic groups. And no, I do not agree with other views this said gentleman has if you care to find him.
I just loved how a phrase that so many use and agree with came from a known racist.

While I don't get into race baiting and all that stuff, it is part of my understanding because if I am to share
true knowledge on what I know, I must be sensitive to the biological differences of others. Race is not skin deep.
And nutrition absorption and assimilation are not the same for all peoples. So I must be cognizant of this fact
in order for all people to benefit from what I wish to share.

I am not the next guy trying to sell snake oil or the next life extension product. I will warn people about this later on
as this thread matures. I know full well of what is coming in the future for products relating to what I talk about
and I know how to filter out the fakes and frauds, or simply inefficient things. I could do without you trying to distort the
concepts I am attempting to elaborate on for the benefit of others. You are always welcome to continue with your
comments. I appreciate you as much as everyone else.

Words can't express the amount of mental face-palms I've done while reading your paragraphs.

1) Nutrition and dietary factors have a negligible to no effect on the outwards appearance of skin, incase you didn't know, Wrinkles form primarily because of skin dryness coupled with loss of collagen that results in your skin losing it's "bounce back" ability, meaning that it can no longer regain it's former shape when pulled, or when you smile or frown(Hence smile/frown lines and crowlines etc). The vast majority of collagen loss and damage comes not from aging, but from UVA/UVB rays given off by the Sun.

2) Yes, different racial groups have different genetic makeups, but they are not enough to actually make the distinction of being different races. Race when it comes to humans is what we call a social construct. You should look into genetics.

Everything and I mean everything you've said is false... This guy below worked 28 years as a truck driver, and the sun would constantly hit the left side of his face while driving. These are the results of constant UVA/UVB rays hitting one's face daily for 28 years:

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/06/06/bill-mcelligott-sun-damage_n_1573546.html