Quote from: iram91445 on May 14, 2015, 07:39:31 PM

Quote from: katerniko1 on May 14, 2015, 07:27:08 PM

Quote from: 98problems on May 14, 2015, 07:07:11 PM

Quote from: GannickusX on May 14, 2015, 07:03:19 PM

Quote from: GrandmaJean on May 14, 2015, 06:20:57 PM

Quote from: katerniko1 on May 14, 2015, 06:16:41 PM

Quote from: WhatTheGox on May 14, 2015, 06:14:54 PM

Quote from: ETFbitcoin on May 14, 2015, 05:44:37 AM

In theory 0% won't give you any profit or loss, since it's 0%
But, in reality even the site give you 0% house edge. Most people will lose because greed

But, if a dice site has negative house edge, gamblers might start making profit. But, some of them will lose because greed

0% hourse edge is good but nothing to be won or lost either way long term, often sites cant even make as entertaining a site due to lack of profits. 0% or very tiny house rake with p2p games is where its at.

i dont agree

i think casino would still profit

of course they would because there are a lot of gamblers that dont know how to play they either loose everything because of greed or they just do rage bets to recover the losses what leads into even bigger loose

Is not because they dont know how to play (there is no strategy for dice anyways, its just luck) and its not because greed. A 0% house edge would profit because unless you bet the same amount every time to be at 0 profit you would end up loosing using any other "strategy" like martingale or whatever you want to use

there also is a strategy to use for example its better to make much more smaller bets than one all in bet, without it there could be much more strategies and martingale would work for a while if the player wouldnt be greedy

i will still stay with my theory a site with 0% house edge would profit enough for owner to make money and pay bills to keep it open

i think you are right though there can be whale players who will try to beat the dice site what will lead to looses

that is why there is max bet allowed

let's say 0.1btc for start or something like that