Quote from: samysamy1 on May 15, 2015, 08:12:04 PM

Quote from: kelsey on May 15, 2015, 12:32:44 PM

Quote from: samysamy1 on May 15, 2015, 12:30:19 PM

Quote from: kelsey on May 14, 2015, 03:31:16 PM

Quote from: tokeweed on May 13, 2015, 12:04:15 PM

Also, "the tech is better than every coin out there, so it will rise soon". LOL

is it a currency or a mission to mars Huh

Both requires technology/programming innovation

unless that innovation involves a simplification of bitcoin then all innovative new coins are a con or a fail (if devs are geniune). thing is here most use the innovation line purely to sell snake oil.

which brings me to the other big lie;

"its new code so its a coin 2.0"

being new code does not automatically make it better then bitcoin

The work that goes into the creation of a new coin isn't easy (except from a fork of course) and requires some acedemic knowledge.
Here you can find an example of difficult math calculations and other stuff.

*edit: It took them more than a year to develop

and how in any way shape or form does that automatically make it an improvement bitcoin (which claiming 2.0 tries to elude to) or even means anything of value was created Huh

seriously just doing work doesn't mean you created something of value, or even something that should be rewarded.

you could go out into your backyard and dig holes and fill them up, do a hell of alot of hard work but nothing really achieved or deserving of reward.

in software literally billions of dollars of man hours have been wasted on vaporware.

so i stand by my statement that;

"its new code so its a coin 2.0"

is a big lie bagholders tell themselves (and everyone else).