Quote from: URSAY on May 15, 2015, 05:39:22 PM

Quote from: battbot on May 15, 2015, 05:27:29 PM

Quote from: URSAY on May 15, 2015, 04:42:58 PM

Quote from: battbot on May 15, 2015, 03:48:28 PM

Quote from: URSAY on May 15, 2015, 03:33:27 PM

Manufacturing credibility by throwing around Ethereum's name.

Yea, this is false. Ethereum has to update their codebase (with xbridge) in order to become "Blocknet-enabled." So while not officially calling it a "partnership," this is clearly a two-sided collaboration (and one that may well turn into an "official" partnership).

So the cointelegraph article is not entirely true? This quote was pulled directly from that article.

http://cointelegraph.com/news/114228/blocknet-adding-ethereum-to-suite-of-supported-currencies

No, the article is accurate. There is "little to no work on Ethereum's side" because Dan is providing the poc for them. In other words, Dan is doing the work for them. This does not change the fact that Ethereum's codebase will be updated with xbridge to become "Blocknet-enabled."

This is wonderful news. Will the Ethereum team be able to help Dan with his financial problems?

Nice circular reasoning.