I created PICISI, Vod accused me of scamming, then proceeded to create multiple accounts to appear to be PICISI to misrepresent both me and PICISI:

Quote from: Vod on May 18, 2015, 01:31:16 AM

Quote from: Armis on May 17, 2015, 05:52:23 PM

Oh and the nonsense didn't stop there,
- creating a fake "official PICISI" accounts - no longer is use. Determined it was too close to your PICISI username to be ethical to use
- creating a fake "offical PICISI" account - no longer is use. Determined it was too close to your PICISI username to be ethical to use
- ~~creating a PICSIS account (see spelling)~~ - can't find this username, but it wasn't created by me.
- creating a pickissy account - the official account used by the official PICISI site. The only account legally authorized to speak on behalf of the website.

You forgot this one:

- creating a fake "Armis_" account- not created my me. Probably created by Armis to make me look bad. I have left the "Armis_" account negative trust. Feel free to let me know if you find any others.

I'm too honest and ethical to create fake accounts to try and steal donations - and the Administrators of the site can see this.

The only account that is used is Pickissy - the one that actually represents the official PICISI project. The official PICISI site does not ask for donations. Ignore any other user names presented to you by a known scammer.

You created fake accounts then later 'determine' that it was unethical then closed them. But some how you could not see how unethical it was while you were thinking about it?

It was unethical when you thought about, that was the time to remove it, but you failed to,
it was unethical when you started the process, that was the 2nd time your conscious told you to reconsider, but you dismissed it,
it was unethical when you agreed to the terms of the site that essentially said operate by the golden rule, but you refused,
it was unethical when you used it to access the site, with that username but by this time there was no more good in you to stand for righteousness,
it was unethical when you used it to create an entry, and by this time your heart had to be beating faster because you knew or should have known that your wrong would be found out.
it was unethical when you allowed it to remain as long as you did. this is when other probably told you: "what are you doing?" "Stop that", "take it down", "you're going to regret that", "I don't think you should do that", "that's going to be a problem for you", "be careful with that I'm not sure if anyone is going to have your back on that" ... and only then was it "determined" that it was unethical.

and it wasn't for only one fake account, or two phony accounts, it was for at least THREE FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS that you identified as unethical. But it doesn't end there, you still created other accounts for the sole purpose of misrepresenting yourself as someone authorized to represent PICISI. And have the audacity to claim that because the start-up hasn't started that you have the right to freely abuse and mistreat it. What are you some corporate abortionist?

Then, after all of that you actually call yourself "honest and ethical" even after admitting to mass unethical behavior-- how pathological is that?

[/quote]

He still maintains accounts and is still using them to misrepresent me. How is that not unethical, how is that not scammy, how is that not wrong on so many levels especially for a purported scam buster.