Quote from: LaudaM on May 18, 2015, 09:19:51 AM

Quote from: Armis on May 18, 2015, 08:41:53 AM

-snip-
He still maintains accounts and is still using them to misrepresent me. How is that not unethical, how is that not scammy, how is that not wrong on so many levels especially for a purported scam buster.

If you have the proof provide it, otherwise stop causing unnecessary drama. With the absence of evidence, there is nothing that you can do. I can claim to be the rightful king of England. Roll Eyes

Vod has every right to give you negative trust as soon as he 'thinks' that you might be a scammer. Every member can give you negative trust for that very same reason.

Someone needs to lock this already.

Vod is using a scammy account to give the false impression that he speaks for PICISI, but worse than that he is also actually lying when he claims that any sponsor requested a refund, not sponsor requested any refund. In fact 1 has indicated that his next new business will also be a PICISI sponsor.

This is outrageous, not only because Vod is purporting to be associated with PICISI, but he's claiming that I said things that I didn't say in that post. Note that the thread is locked and apparently only unlocked when Vod want to make a new entry. That is not free speech that's libelous misrepresentation:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1060460.0

So LaudaM is what you see there necessary drama?

Is the foolishness that Vod is doing necessary drama?

Is it necessary for him to create accounts in order to mislead people into thinking that he is representing PICISI when he doesn't?

Why would you even demand proof of anything when you had sufficient proof of gross malfeasance right in front of your face.
It goes directly to Vod's credibility, I didn't make it up, those are his words, that's his admission of malfeasance.

You pointing out Vods right to give neg feedback is "unnecessary" because that wasn't the subject, what was addressed was
vod's false witness, was his scammy behavior, was his fraudulent and misleading use of accounts to damage the character of
my username and the name of PICISI. Do you believe he has a right to do that?