Quote from: Vod on May 18, 2015, 10:01:30 AM

Quote from: erikalui on May 18, 2015, 09:42:32 AM

Yeah true. Only Badbear can find a connection with the IP addresses and not the others who have left him negative just based on Badbear's trusted feedback as they have no evidence to present here. To me it just appears as trust abuse.

I'm guilty of being one who left negative feedback based on BB's ability to look at IP addresses.

The OP has sent me many death threats. So IMHO it's important for new users to see that scum get more that a simple -6. That scum has done much more than scam.

If I knew who he was and where he lived, he'd get Alberta Justice from me. He probably wouldn't so quick to throw out death threats after that.

Oh damn! I am sorry but I dint know that. He's a psycho.

Quote from: Muhammed Zakir on May 18, 2015, 11:32:48 AM

QS left negative feedback before BadBear left and also once you strongly believe a user is scammer, you can leave negative feedback. Leaving more than one feedback will also help in preventing negative trust rating to be a neutral rating.

OK. The trust system doesn't show the time and all show the same date. Also, QS dint give any reference nor evidence so his feedback unlike the user railzand who left him feedback claiming the same with a reference to a post that has been deleted. Preventing from a neutral rating is definitely a good idea but there are less chances that a scammer can get positives from a default trust member (which is the case with the OP). If I believe a person is a scammer for sure, I'll leave him negative feedback (but that's not when others leave him feedback and then I negate him).

In this case, the OP does seem suspicious as he hasn't only received feedback from Badbear but from others who have made such claims 4 months back.