Quote from: jabo38 on May 19, 2015, 03:20:56 PM

Quote from: tyz on May 19, 2015, 03:02:29 PM

I am just curious. Do you have reasons why the Nxt communtiy wasn't very supportive? From my experience, they are very open-minded and supportive for new ideas no matter are crazy they are Grin

Quote from: jabo38 on May 19, 2015, 02:41:12 PM

Quote from: CryptKeeper on May 19, 2015, 09:32:23 AM

Quote from: jantenner81 on May 19, 2015, 07:25:58 AM

Quote from: CryptKeeper on May 19, 2015, 06:20:49 AM

Why NXT is just not using AT like QORA and BURST is doing ? Easier workaround IMO

That would be really great! AT on Nxt was discussed long ago (early 2014) and I supported it (still have a big chunk of NxtAT assets Undecided

). AFAIK the Nxt AT project isn't dead - yet, but nobody knows if or when this will be integrated into Nxt. Creating a working ACCT between these three coins would show the Nxt community the real potential behind AT, arousing interest again for a complete AT implementation.

The advantage for Qora and Burst (besides trading them in NXT) would be that you could buy these coins with BTC in two steps using the nxt-based multigateway, fully decentralized!

CIYAM originally was working on AT at NXT and it was planned to be implemented there, but if from what I remember correctly they weren't very supportive. To bad for them.

Also, congratulations to Burst and Qora. That is quite an accomplishment.

It is all documented on their forum. I remember at one point they weren't helping him out with a testnet, which is a pretty important thing when testing this stuff. This is a long time ago, but basically after CIYAM left NXT, he then started working with Burst and Qora.

Mainly security concerns by the devs, you can read it here: https://nxtforum.org/index.php?topic=134.msg50922#msg50922

I can also remember some negative sentiments regarding the monetizing of AT services with the NxtAT asset.