Not sure if game players want to pick an unnecessary fight with the government.
Sometimes I feel you should have some acid to relieve yourself of the irrational fear of government (it helps). You are the most government-fearing person that I know, and that is not fitting for an alpha-male.
You should conduct your life such that the government anticipates how much they lose if they try to harass you, and leave you alone.
The game is not associated with any government, jurisdiction or law. It is just a game. Like playing Monopoly. It is your problem if you feel that the government has the right to infringe your playing a game. I don't give them such a right concerning mine.
The distasteful voice is because I have a distaste for government, and would rather not speak about it. I also seldom speak about shit that sticks to the sole of my shoe. And I don't lift my hand to remove it, same as I don't lift my hand to remove the government. But I don't touch it either.
I missed this until Erdogan quoted it.
I am calculating the government is going to lose 0 up to $trillions because of me.
I am just making the point that people that don't have any vested reason for fight, often don't see any incentive for waging one.
Marketing is about matching concerns (demographics).
I didn't say it won't work. I am just wondering what gaming has to do with the anonymity fight? Seems like two different demographics.
I thought the gaming idea with your game coin would work well. Adding the anonymity seemed like going in the wrong direction or at least until the gamers have some need for it.